<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>David Wulf Riordan's Weblog &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daveriordan.com/posts/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daveriordan.com</link>
	<description>Connecting the dots of New Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:33:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>SMS: The Election Secret Weapon</title>
		<link>http://daveriordan.com/posts/sms-the-election-secret-weapon/</link>
		<comments>http://daveriordan.com/posts/sms-the-election-secret-weapon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Riordan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveriordan.com/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally published in the Hamilton College Spectator on October 24, 2008.
Remember those simpler times when we didn&#8217;t know who Senators McCain and Obama would pick as their Vice-Presidential nominees?  It feels like decades ago, but there was  a time before &#8220;Hockey Mom&#8221; was a punchline and the media thought &#8220;Gaffezilla&#8221; was a poorly foreign translated movie.  It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Originally published in the <a href="http://spec.hamilton.edu">Hamilton College Spectator</a> on October 24, 2008.</em></p>
<p>Remember those simpler times when we didn&#8217;t know who Senators McCain and Obama would pick as their Vice-Presidential nominees?  It feels like decades ago, but there <em>was  </em>a time before &#8220;Hockey Mom&#8221; was a punchline and the media thought &#8220;Gaffezilla&#8221; was a poorly foreign translated movie.  It was August and anticipation was in the air: literally.  In the early hours of August 23rd, 2008, the Obama campaign made their announcement of running mate Joe Biden to the world over-the-air through a simple mobile text message.</p>
<p>That text message was the Obama campaign&#8217;s secret weapon for voter turnout.</p>
<p>In the weeks leading up to the announcement, the Obama campaign&#8217;s media team had been hyping the announcement, using every interview to encourage people to &#8220;Text VP to 62262&#8243;  to be the first to find out who the nominee would be.  Meanwhile the &#8220;sign up to find out&#8221; message was the centerpiece of a massive online ad campaign for much of August, eventually encouraging 3 million people to sign up.</p>
<p>And by the time the text message went out around 3am on August 23rd, the Obama campaign had compiled what was perhaps the largest list of campaign supporters&#8217; mobile phone numbers ever assembled.</p>
<p>So far, there haven&#8217;t been any reports of the campaign using this list to make terrifying &#8220;robocalls&#8221;, but doing that would squander the value of the list.  Rather, the campaign likely plans to use the list of 3 million mobile numbers to send out one final text message right before the election: a simple reminder to vote on November 4.  It&#8217;s like a reverse American Idol.</p>
<p>Frederic Guarino, a mobile marketing expert at Hemisphere NoBrainer, put the strategy succinctly: &#8220;Mobile is a trigger.&#8221;  By collecting the mobile phone numbers of 3 million likely voters, the Obama campaign will theoretically be able to mobilize supporters to get to the polls, using a tactic cutting edge marketers have been advocating for years for their corporate clients.</p>
<p>Does it work &#8211; absolutely.  A 2006 study conducted by the New Voters Project found that a text message reminder increased the liklihood of a new voter actually showing up to vote by 4.2% and was considered &#8220;helpful&#8221; by 59% of recipients.  For the campaign consultants, the real value is the price: only $1.56 per vote cast.  While it&#8217;s just as effective in turning out voters as a &#8220;quality&#8221; phone call, the call costs about $20 per vote cast, meaning it&#8217;s efficacy and cost effectiveness makes it a viable tactic for upstart campaigns.  Get Out The Vote just got a lot more accessible.</p>
<p>And yes, even &#8220;likely&#8221; voters don&#8217;t turn out some times.  I spent a good deal of time working on my local Congressional primary, which coincidentially was the same morning I bought an iPhone.  Even though I was involved in the campaign, I&#8217;d completely forgotten it was primary day, and as I sat in the parking lot, checking my email on the iPhone for the first time, I got a message reminding me to vote.  The race wasn&#8217;t even close, but getting that email on my phone was what got me to the polls that morning.</p>
<p>Rana Sobhany knows a thing or two about the intersection of politics and mobile.  She&#8217;s a former grassroots campaign consultant turned rockstar publicist turned mobile guru who&#8217;s currently the head of marketing for Medialets, a creative ad network for the iPhone, Android, and other rich-mobile devices.  &#8220;As campaigns begin to shift their focus to digital, the promise of mobile becomes the epitome of personalized reach to constituents. The mobile phone is the most personal device one owns, particularly in middle America where mobile phones are far more ubiquitous and constantly connected than computers. which makes it the clear platform of choice for large campaigns, spearheaded by the Obama camp.&#8221;</p>
<p>This tactic could be the difference between electoral victory in several close states, mobilizing enough supporters to turn out to counteract the undecided voters who turn out for the other side.  Whether it&#8217;s enough to counteract the &#8220;Bradley Effect&#8221; is yet to be seen, but in a race where pollsters are only starting to come to terms with the &#8220;cell phone gap&#8221;, use mobile phones could turn out to be one of the most valuable tactics in any campaign&#8217;s arsenal.</p>
<p>On November 4th, watch the screens.</p>
<p>Disclosure:  David Riordan has previously worked with both Hemisphere NoBrainer and Medialets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daveriordan.com/posts/sms-the-election-secret-weapon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Cameron and Barack Obama: Time for change means taking time to think</title>
		<link>http://daveriordan.com/posts/david-cameron-and-barack-obama-time-for-change-means-time-to-think/</link>
		<comments>http://daveriordan.com/posts/david-cameron-and-barack-obama-time-for-change-means-time-to-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Riordan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relaxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveriordan.com/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tory leader David Cameron and Barack Obama certainly have a lot in common, including a shared belief that &#8220;thinking time&#8221; and relaxation are essential to fulfilling the offices they both aspire to.
In the year since he became the leader of the opposition Conservative Party, the charismatic 41-year old Cameron has reinvented British conservatism and revitalized [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tory leader David Cameron and Barack Obama certainly have a lot in common, including a shared belief that &#8220;thinking time&#8221; and relaxation are essential to fulfilling the offices they both aspire to.</p>
<p>In the year since he became the leader of the opposition Conservative Party, the charismatic 41-year old Cameron has reinvented British conservatism and <a href="http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?source=hptextfeature&amp;story_id=11701791">revitalized his party</a> to such an extent that it now maintains a 20-point lead in polls ahead of the incumbent Labour party, led by the wildly unpopular Gordon Brown.</p>
<p>Cameron and Obama have become the faces of the ideology of Change that citizens on both sides of the Atlantic are clamoring for.</p>
<p>And as men who have both been on rigorous campaigns and in interruption-laden jobs, they also share an understanding that it&#8217;s simply not possible to fulfill your duties by <em>&#8220;working&#8221;</em> 100% of the time.</p>
<p>Obama met with Cameron earlier today as one of the last stops on his <a href="http://www.comedycentral.com/videos/index.jhtml?videoId=176351">international tour</a>, and in a private conversation picked up by ABC, Cameron asked Obama if he&#8217;d gotten a break yet.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;You should be on the beach,&#8221; Cameron told Obama. &#8220;You need a break. Well, you need to be able to keep your head together.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;You&#8217;ve got to refresh yourself,&#8221; agreed Obama.</p>
<p>&#8220;Do you have a break at all?&#8221; asked Cameron.</p>
<p>&#8220;I have not,&#8221; said Obama. &#8220;I am going to take a week in August. But I agree with you that somebody, somebody who had worked in the White House who &#8212; not Clinton himself, but somebody who had been close to the process &#8211;  said that, should we be successful, that actually the most important thing you need to do is to have big chunks of time during the day when all you&#8217;re doing is thinking. And the biggest mistake that a lot of these folks make is just feeling as if you have to be &#8212; &#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;These guys just chalk your diary up,&#8221; said Cameron, referring to a packed schedule.</p>
<p>&#8220;Right,&#8221; Obama said. &#8220;In 15 minute increments …&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;We call it the dentist&#8217;s waiting room,&#8221; Cameron said. &#8220;You have to scrap that because you&#8217;ve got to have time.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;And, well, and you start making mistakes,&#8221; Obama said, &#8220;or you lose the big picture. Or you lose a sense of, I think you lose a feel&#8211; &#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Your feeling,&#8221; interrupted Cameron. &#8220;And that is exactly what politics is all about. The judgment you bring to make decisions.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s exactly right,&#8221; Obama said. &#8220;And the truth is that we&#8217;ve got a bunch of smart people, I think, who know ten times more than we do about the specifics of the topics. And so if what you&#8217;re trying to do is micromanage and solve everything then you end up being a dilettante but you have to have enough knowledge to make good judgments about the choices that are presented to you.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: right;">(Conversation quoted from ABC&#8217;s <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/07/microphone-pick.html">Political Punch</a>)</p>
<p>The residents of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. and 10 Downing St. have two of the most intense and stressful jobs in the world, and that their next residents already recognize the need to deal with these stresses is a good sign.</p>
<p>Certainly there&#8217;s such a thing as <a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/pressclips/archive/images/bush-lifts-logs-crawford.jpg">overdoing it</a>, but there&#8217;s a marked distinction between mindless vacation and thinking time.  Thinking time is like <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/18/science/18memory.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">sleep</a>, processing information and recombining it along with reducing physical and mental stress (in fact, sleep absolutely constitutes thinking time).</p>
<p>So to those who believe in the philosophy of 200% efficiency 100% of the time, take a minute to reflect on the thoughts of the next leaders of the free world; you might just come up with your next great idea in that moment of reflection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daveriordan.com/posts/david-cameron-and-barack-obama-time-for-change-means-time-to-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
